In any case the police should also examine the justice of the order. Not only the legal or legal part. On the other hand, the citizen is accepted of an unfair, not by the one who gave the order, but by the one who executes it.
CRIMINAL CODE Article 21
Command
1. It is not unjust for an act which one undertakes to carry out an order given to him, according to the legal processes, by the qualifiled authority, if the law does not allow the recipient of the order to examine whether it is lawful or not. In this case, whoever gave the order is the one punished as the perpetrator.
2. The provision does not apply if the order is demonstrably unconstitutional or illegal.
What does the poet say here? That someone, because he has been placed in a position of authority, can give an order to someone else and the recipient will not ask him if he is legal or not?
That is, someone in authority can act unfairly but the law will perceive it as fair.
Which fair law prohibits someone to examine if a command from an authority is legal? Ie the authority will do what it wants on us. And if someone executes an unfair order, will they be unaccountable?
If for example a police officer unfairly beats a citizen on the street because he received an order. They made it legal. But is it fair?
In any case the police officer should also examine the justice of the order. Not only the legal or the jurisprudential part. On the other hand, the citizen is becoming the recipient of unfairness, not by the one who gave the order, but by the one who executes it.
So the citizen should have been able to act legally against both, because both are acting unfairly.
But there are cases where the citizen can command one service or the authority behind it (like the orders of repayment of all debt that you can find in the offices of ellinon syneleysis ).
Here the citizen becomes a principal and commands!
So the employees, for example, of the tax department can execute the order, because here the citizen can command and in fact the service is called to check the legality. And they must do it.
And with paragraph 1 of article 21, the order must be executed and the citizen is considered author. So the employee will be legal if he executes the order. Otherwise, he will not be!
Pursuant to paragraph 2 of article 21 if the order is expressly illegal or unconstitutional, the above citizen should have been prosecuted with serious charges. Something that does not happen.
Source:esy-sydney.blogspot.com
COMMUNICATE EVERYWHERE - DISSEMINATE INFORMATION IN COMMENTS OR POSTS OF OTHER BLOGS OR SITES & IN DIFFERENT facebook GROUPS
SEE ALSO:
Democracy vs Partitocracy
CITIZENSHIP, INDIGENOUS STATUS AND NATIONALITY: 3 COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TERMS
VIDEO: THE AMERICAN DREAM AND ITS DISTINCT CHARACTER "HARTMAN"
WE INVITE AND CALL UPON ALL ELLENES AND PHILELLENES TO UNITE WITH THEIR BROTHERS WITHIN THE ONLY ANTHROPOCENTRIC ORGANISATION TO TAKE THEIR LIVES INTO THEIR OWN HANDS, AND TO ESTABLISH THE ELLENE POLITEIA WITH VALUES, PRINCIPLES AND LAWS OF THE POLITEIA BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE. A POLITEIA THAT THE HUMAN IS WORTH AND SO DESPERATELY NEEDS IN SUCH CRITICAL TIMES.
E.SY. ELLINON SYNELEYSIS
YOUR ANTHROPOCENTRIC ORGANISATION
CONTACT
US:
.png)
No comments:
Post a Comment