Three
completely different terms whose misuse and distortion gives birth to
abnormal social phenomena such as racism even on occasions where it does
not exist. The terms ‘citizen’ and ‘indigenous’ are not related. The
term ‘ethnic’ does contain a sense of ‘indigenous’, however it is still a
different definition. As explained, the distortion of the above terms
forces the creation of the non-naturally occurring narrative of racism,
which is being imposed by its’ so-called critics (anti-racists) even in
the societies in which it is being rejected upon its conception.
The
legal term ‘citizen’ [ypikoos, literally translated as ‘subordinate’]
refers to a person’s political identity, who, as a citizen [literally
‘member of the polity’], conforms to a higher authority, such as the
constitution and its enforcement agencies (whoever they may be). It is a
strictly legal term.
This
issue can be elaborated further. As can be seen, in real democracy, the
term ‘subordinate’ (hence, sub-ordinance), cannot exist and cannot be
incorporated in the natural term ‘citizen’. In democracy it is the
citizen (Politis is the correct term) that dictates policy, and not vice
versa. The one that dictates cannot be subordinate as he should be the
first one to abide to the legislation that he himself has defined. If
this is not the case, then it is not democracy.
This
is the starting point of the thinking process, as it has been concluded
that the Hellene-citizen is constitutionally subordinate. The term
‘Indigenous’ refers to the individual’s natural capacity from his birth.
Nativity
refers to the origins of the human nation [hence Indigenous =
ab-original]. This can be easily proven by blood sampling [e.g. Haplo-
groups]. There is no human without native status. If for any reason an
individual is not aware of their native status this can be easily traced
by blood testing, or, in the worst case, by recognition from
previous generations or their relatives whose native status cannot be
challenged, even among the latest generations (this is one of the
negative outcomes of wars, subjugations and forced migrations).
Under
no circumstances can a person from a different ethnicity be given
native status. This is not a legal term. It has been noted that [in the
‘Hellenic Republic’] a legal term using the same wording (native status)
has been created. This leads to the conclusion that this has been done
on purpose by the legislature in order to identify ‘native status’ with
‘citizenship’ [subordinance] and thus troll the indigenous people, as
current events prove, with their aim being to alienate, by naming, for
example, Afghans as indigenous Hellenes, on the basis that they are
‘an-indigenous’ [sic] (another unnatural term that needed to be made up
in order to force the defining of non-natives as ‘indigenous’.
[The
legislature] has legally defined something that is impossible by
nature, hence, in this case legal science has accepted something that is
un-natural as legitimate.
People
should thoroughly reflect upon the reasons why this happened and what
might be the aim and purpose of those that initiated it. The following
reflection should assist our train of thought: The term ‘national’
[ethnic] refers to the cultural values of the individual. Sharing the
same blood, similar behavior and similar beliefs were three of the main
pillars upon which a nation (‘ethnos’) was constituted when the term was
first coined by our ancestors. In our days, this strict definition has
been altered, and individuals have been included in foreign societies,
by means of converting to the indigenous beliefs and behavior. As for
the same bloodline, the numerous population mixtures (resulting from
endless wars and migrations) have given way and going back two or three
generations is a sufficient enough way for a non- indigenous to acquire
the so-called ‘national conscience’ through common education and
training.
This
can cause serious issues to a society when it occurs suddenly and in
large numbers. It expresses itself with extensive violations and a peak
in criminality. A classic example of this are the United States of
America, as well as central and northern Europe where criminal rates are
much higher than in Greece and Italy.
Here
is thus the third reflection, which joins the other two and co-exists
with them in the same space and time. The distortion of these
definitions in terms of their natural state in contrast to their current
legal status is visible and unquestionable; as well as the distortions
they cause to the comparatively healthier western societies such as the
Hellenic one (and others, such as the Italian one) who are already
experiencing a cultural decline, with the aims being obvious.
A further clarification is given here, so that readers do not jump to erroneous interpretations and conclusions:
The
problem is not the individuals that assimilate in a new society, as
they, themselves, are victims as well. If those wielding power and
resources (in effect, the aggressors of humanity) made sure they did not
destroy their societies and supported their economy and freedom, so
they could live safely in their own countries, they would not need to
leave.
Even
if this (stability in their country) occurred today, they would
definitely return home. The ones that would stay behind would be the
very few ones that have committed crimes in their countries; Thus, it
would be very easy to find them and send them to their -by now- properly
ruled countries in order to face trial.
The
real and specific aggressors are multi-national corporations of every
kind, mass media and religions, and equally, their totally subordinate
executives, politicians, lawyers, legislators, doctors, journalists,
bankers, corporate executives, along with a number of either paid or
even independent ‘well-doers’, who left their humanity behind, if ever
they had any, who have destroyed the societies of the ‘an-natives’; in
the same way, they destroy and will keep destroying the indigenous
societies, believing there will be no repercussions on them and that
they will survive this anti-human cataclysm.
Racism,
because this is what it is all about, is a characteristic of those that
create those kinds of situations, and all humans are victims of those
individuals. There is now no person on the planet that is not being
affected by the racism of the anti-humans that destroy human societies.
And this is because racists are not human; humans are all one race,
therefore [humans] have no race. Race is a characteristic of animals
(e.g. dogs), not the anatomically modern humans of the last few
millenniums.
Hence,
all humans are being attacked. If we were to categorize humans in
races, we would do so along anthropological definitions that define
their intellectual level, such as homo sapiens, homo erectus, homo
neanderthalensis etc., which today are all extinct by way of natural
selection bar one. Categorizing humans depending on their skin colour,
religious and political beliefs is inconsistent with the nature of human
genes.
This
can be simply observed in groups of multi-ethnic societies of young
children. No child would see anyone as its inferior, not only humans,
but not even animals. There is no such genetic predetermination.
Racism
is acquired, and on a first stage is imposed by being made known to our
children. A thing that does not exist in nature, it becomes part of
their lives; but we, humans, have decided it exists and made it exist in
our societies. Also in religions, where redundant rules are being
taught, such as thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt
not bear false witness against thy neighbour, honour thy father and thy
mother, thou shalt not commit adultery, to children that have not even
thought about committing any of these, and we inform them that they
could if they wanted to, but… it is forbidden. Oh really? Does it? As
simply as that… almost from birth, we teach them what kind of beasts
they can become… as long as they decide to.
If,
then, someone is attacking human kind, it goes to show that they
themselves cannot be human, but rather, another type of creature
definitely, but not human.
Read the Policy Statements of ELLINON SYNELEYSIS regarding HEADING G: NATIONALITY outlining that no one will have more rights than the Sovereign, Native and Indigenous Ellene Politis (Greek Citizen).
Original Version
Read the Policy Statements of ELLINON SYNELEYSIS regarding HEADING G: NATIONALITY outlining that no one will have more rights than the Sovereign, Native and Indigenous Ellene Politis (Greek Citizen).
Original Version
ELLANIOS PHOENIX
THE REBIRTH OF KNOWLEDGE
THE REBIRTH OF THE HUMAN BEING (ANTHROPOS)
.png)
No comments:
Post a Comment